In our increasingly globalised times where communications, trading and technology are characterised by an ever-expanding global outreach, there is a parallel tendency of the physical settings of large corporations and organisations to become increasingly self-contained and insular in the physical spaces they occupy. This paradox of partial autonomy has been the preoccupation of Diploma 2 throughout the year, initially setting out to analyse partly or fully self-governed territories. These studies informed and led to the design of deterritorialised autonomous blocks or enclaves constituting political societies that were to a certain extent independent from their context and maintained their own regulations, laws and customs. We travelled to Los Angeles and the Mojave Desert, along daily immigration routes, nature reserves, desert motels and congested metropolitan freeways. At these locations, we looked for places that would host and enable the independence of our proposals. This independence eventually came from locality, articulated spatial organisation, or the choice of programme. In terms of locality, Suram’s project addressed the tensions arising between two neighbouring ethnic communities on either side of a freeway by placing a controlled trading zone at their boundary.
In Dimitri’s project the international waters beyond the US coast provided an aqueous landscape where immigration laws could be bypassed, allowing for the creation of an autonomous IT campus. In terms of programme, Yijun proposed small-scale movie studios dispersed at various freeway intersections where through a public-private partnership scheme LA would directly construct its own fictions. In Teeba’s case a typical Californian motel would conceal hidden spaces accessed by clandestine groups operating in the larger metropolitan area, while Yiran attempted to alleviate the transition from incarceration to civil integration through a strategically placed long-stay visitor scheme at the edge of San Quentin prison. Olivia’s proposal investigated the diplomatic law that provides immunity within the premises of a consulate building – ultimately concealing the existence of a refugee camp. Natalia rethought the endless grid of the parking lot as a drive-through amusement car park, with the use of fiction and the hybridisation of programme exposing a new type of autonomy.
Nuria Alvarez Lombardero
Charles Arsène- Henry
Valentin Bontjes Van Beek
Francisco Gonzales de Canales
Theo Sarantoglou Lalis
Carlos Villanueva Brandt
The project forms part of an ambitious plan on the part of a group of countries, whose economies are suffering due to ageing populations, to invigorate their economies by ‘adopting’ children from other countries that do not suffer from the same problem in order to increase their size, and to lower the average age of their workforce.
Having technically explored child psychology and the emotive significance of colour use, the scheme proposes an inner city machine to prepare children for exportation to foreign countries.
The building is questioning the nature of community in LA and plays with the extraterritorial status of an embassy to create an architectural space that shelters homeless children and prepares them for life in another country.
The embassy is a place where the children spend some of their most informative years and the behaviours they develop in the embassy will define the people they will become. Looking at school models the project develops an integration of stages within the embassy in correlation with their progress of rehabilitation.