First Year students at the AA are exposed to architecture by translating visual references, thoughts, intuition and briefs into a series of projects that are achieved through forms of design, writing and argument. Work from this year’s explorations was collected based on three themes: get in more stuff, work with architecture, and get it out into the world.
‘Get in More Stuff’ reacted to and translated visual references, stuff and projects into more projects. We accumulated and processed, redrew exemplary projects with known methods and re-enacted spaces, events and objects through drawings. We re-imagined architectures by using analogies with visual references, and we sketched buildings by removing possible irrelevancies. We recomposed idiosyncratic architectures, types and characters.
‘Work with Architecture’ asked students to isolate themselves from all the ‘stuff’. We embraced architecture in its scale, form and spatial relations by designing 10x10m spaces placed in a 1x1km context. Architectural elements were developed through relentless iterations of raw models and drawings. We questioned the building timeline, while montages and drawings shifted its uses. We questioned the limits of particular archetypes by pushing their limits and testing their placement in real contexts using texts, plans and models.
‘Get it Out into the World’ addressed the consequences of a project by testing its relationship to a city. Students constructed a series of arguments and speculated possible relations between the architect, the work and his or her audience.
This year, all intervals of engagement in and outside the studio mattered, and the students’ portfolios disclose their own ways of looking, thinking, telling and putting forward positions and projects of architecture in a spirit that is open and daringly vulnerable.
Head of First Year
Monia De Marchi
James A Craig
Maria Shéhérazade Giudici
Special thanks to our contributors and speakers
Pier Vittorio Aureli
Valentin Bontjes van Beek
Cristian Sanchez Gonzalez
Many thanks to the MS, HTS and TS First Year tutors, our guests and critics, the Admissions office and maintenance staff.
Driven by the constant negation of architectural knowledge, the coexisting oppositions and intersecting contradictions the yearlong project of my portfolio focuses on finding, or defining an opinion on architecture. What is common in many of the outcomes of different briefs is the presence of the negative matter, mainly shadows, bundles of experiential information, which allegorically signify an opinion.